Skip to content 
The VAT liability for electronic services in accordance with Section 2b UStG is a central regulation in German tax law. It defines the tax obligations for companies that provide electronic services. Electronic services are digital products and services that are provided via electronic networks.
This provision has far-reaching effects on the tax treatment of companies in the digital sector. § Section 2b UStG specifically regulates the VAT liability for legal entities under public law that offer electronic services. The provision specifies the conditions under which these services are subject to Value added tax are subject to.
Various Criteria such as the type of service, the group of recipients and possible distortions of competition. The application of § 2b UStG requires a precise examination of the respective business activity. There are certain exceptions and special regulations that must be taken into account.
The correct implementation of this regulation is of great importance for companies in order to ensure tax compliance and minimise potential risks.
Key Takeaways
- Electronic services are subject to VAT in accordance with Section 2b UStG
- The electronic services include, among other things, the provision of Softwaredatabases and online courses
- There are exceptions to the VAT liability for certain services, e.g. if the recipient is an entrepreneur
- In certain cases, providers of electronic services must register abroad and provide their services there. Value added tax discharge
- Non-compliance with VAT regulations for electronic services can result in legal consequences and fines
Definition of electronic services according to § 2b UStG
Examples of electronic services
This includes, for example, the provision of Softwarethe transmission of Datathe provision of online teaching, the hosting of websites and the provision of online access to databases. These services are generally provided without physical interaction between provider and customer and can be accessible worldwide.
Exemptions from electronic services
It is important to note that not all digital products and services are considered electronic services within the meaning of Section 2b UStG. For example, the sale of physical products via the internet or the provision of telecommunication services are not covered by this provision.
Correct determination of VAT liability
The exact delimitation of electronic services in accordance with Section 2b UStG is therefore of great importance in order to correctly determine the VAT liability.
Scope of application and exemptions from VAT liability for electronic services
The scope of VAT liability for electronic services in accordance with Section 2b UStG extends to all companies that offer such services, regardless of whether they are based in Germany or abroad. This means that foreign companies offering their services in Germany are also subject to VAT in accordance with Section 2b UStG. However, there are certain exceptions to the VAT liability for electronic services, which are set out in Section 3a para.
5 UStG are regulated. These include small business regulations, which apply to companies with an annual turnover of less than 17,500 euros, as well as certain tax-exempt services, such as educational and cultural services. It is important to note these exemptions in order to ensure the correct tax treatment of electronic services.
Registration and taxation for providers of electronic services
| date | Number of registered providers | Value added tax rate | Tax return submitted |
|---|---|---|---|
| January 2021 | 150 | 19% | Yes |
| February 2021 | 180 | 19% | Yes |
| March 2021 | 200 | 19% | Yes |
Providers of electronic services must register for VAT in accordance with Section 18i UStG and pay tax on their sales accordingly. This applies to both domestic and foreign providers who offer their services in Germany. The obligation to register exists regardless of the amount of turnover generated and must be completed in good time in order to avoid fines and other sanctions.
The taxation of electronic services is generally carried out according to the so-called "Mini-One-Stop-Shop" (MOSS) procedure, which enables providers to submit and manage their VAT returns centrally. This simplifies tax processing for companies that offer their services across borders and are registered in different EU member states.
VAT liability for digital products and services abroad
The VAT liability for digital products and services abroad is a complex issue that affects many companies that offer their services across borders. According to the EU directives on VAT on electronic services, providers must tax their sales in the country in which the customer is based. This means that companies that offer their services in several EU member states must tax their sales according to the respective national regulations.
To facilitate tax processing, providers can use the MOSS procedure to submit and manage their VAT returns centrally. However, it is important to note that the tax regulations for digital products and services abroad can vary from country to country and that precise knowledge of national laws is required.
Consequences of non-compliance with VAT regulations for electronic services
Consequences of non-compliance
Companies that violate the applicable regulations may be subject to fines and other penalties. In addition, there may be additional tax payments, which can represent a considerable financial burden.
Preventive measures
In order to avoid these consequences, it is therefore very important to pay close attention to the relevant tax regulations and to comply with the necessary registration and reporting obligations.
Correct taxation and documentation
In addition, companies should ensure that they pay tax on their sales correctly and keep all necessary documents in order to be able to prove that they have fulfilled their tax obligations in the event of a tax audit.
Current developments and changes in connection with § 2b UStG
In recent years, there have been a number of Developments and changes in connection with Section 2b UStG and the VAT liability for electronic services. In particular, the EU directives on the taxation of digital products and services were revised in order to simplify and harmonise the tax treatment of cross-border services. In addition, new regulations have been introduced to combat tax evasion and avoidance in the digital economy and to harmonise the tax treatment of cross-border services. Transparency to improve.
Companies should therefore always have the latest Developments and changes in tax law and adapt their tax obligations accordingly. It is advisable to regularly inform yourself about relevant changes to the law and, if necessary, seek professional tax advice to ensure that you always comply with current tax regulations. Overall, the VAT liability for electronic services in accordance with Section 2b UStG is a complex issue that affects many companies, especially in the digital economy.
It is therefore very important to pay close attention to the relevant tax regulations and to comply with the necessary registration and reporting obligations in order to avoid fines and other sanctions. In addition, companies should always be informed about current developments in tax law and, if necessary, seek professional tax advice to ensure that they always fulfil their tax obligations.
FAQs
What is § 2b UStG?
§ Section 2b UStG is a paragraph in the German VAT Act that regulates the reverse charge mechanism for certain transactions.
What does the reverse charge mechanism mean?
The reverse charge mechanism means that it is not the supplier who has to pay the VAT, but the recipient of the service.
Which transactions are affected by § 2b UStG?
§ Section 2b UStG primarily concerns sales in the construction industry, metal supplies and the supply of mobile phones.
Why was § 2b UStG introduced?
The introduction of Section 2b UStG serves to combat VAT fraud, particularly in the area of international trade.
What effects does § 2b UStG have on companies?
Companies affected by Section 2b UStG no longer have to pay VAT to the tax office, but instead invoice it to the recipient of the service. This can lead to a changed Accounting and lead to administrative costs.
